Dumbass EU law proposed to cut off file sharers: ACT NOW!

[rozk]

WRITE TO YOUR MEP NOW!!!!!

The '3 strikes and you're out' plan to cut those accused of copyright file sharing off the net - note accused, not found to be guilty - has been sneaked into an EU telecoms bill after it was explicitly defeated earlier this year.

This bill would require all ISPs to monitor all traffic, would doubtless catch those sharing files legally in the net (eg. I frequently shift around large files full of data - how is the ISP to tell if these are legal or not?), and effectively brings collective punishment since you might be cut off as a result of the actions of someone else using your net connection (with or without permission).

The bill is also technically incompetent since the increased use of encrypted P2P and Tor will make it very difficult to even guess reliably at who's sending what to who.

It's not just me worried about this, see a write up on this proposal by a UK Law Professor as well as comments by LJ's own Independent Diplomat.

And these measures are due to be voted on in the European Parliament TOMORROW.

Write to your MEP now using eg. WriteToThem in the UK or use this tool to find out who your MEPs are if you're outside the UK.

gakked from purplecthulhu

I speak as someone who needs to download television shows for purposes that are mostly scholarly - writing some of the stuff I write would be impossible if I had to wait for UK terrestrial airing.

Comments

[londonkds.livejournal.com]

A note for anybody sending a message to MEPs: do not use the words "fair use"! This is a US legal concept and the related concept in the UK is "fair dealing". Referring to "fair use" will, sadly, convince anyone who knows a bit about IP that you are an ignorant anti-IP extremist who isn't worthy of being listened to.

[bohemiancoast.livejournal.com]

OK, MEPs duly spammed through 'Write to Them'. My argument is not around the ethics of filesharing, which I think is a hiding to nothing with most politicians at the moment, but rather with the notion that terminating internet access is a pretty severe punishment that increases the likelihood of social exclusion and we shouldn't be doing it on the uncorroborated say-so of record companies.

[ankh156.livejournal.com]

I've contacted all my ouest-france meps telling them I'm a musiician who passes around files of original stuff - all true. I've filled in the 'contact with citizens' form several times, it doesn't look too communicative - more like a defence. More useful is the meps who give a direct email address whom I sent direct. I'll be watching for the results of this vot tomorrow.

[gauroth.livejournal.com]

Written!

Thanks for the alert. After the Viacom vs Google/Youtube ruling last week, I'm getting very concerned about the threat to the Internet privacy of us ordinary users. It's 'the price of freedom is eternal vigilance' all over again.

[alexwatson.livejournal.com]

Note for those in London: Mary Honeyball (Lab/PSE), on the IMRE committee which votes on Monday, is on the record in support of the motion tabled by MEPs in April which condemned the "3 strikes" plan. For full text see Explanations of votes on A6-0063/2008 (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20080410&secondRef=ITEM-012&language=EN&ring=A6-2008-0063#4-219).

I wrote to her anyway, emphasising that this is an incredibly disproportionate response which can be taken with no regard for due process, and mentioning briefly the privacy concerns and the complete absence of public support.

I'm going to wait and see how the vote goes tomorrow before writing to my other MEPs. I'll also write to Kamall and have a bit of a moan, but not tonight.