I see your whole LJ is now designated as possibly not fit for those under 14 - anything better designed to encourage them to log-in (given that one mouse click is all that is required) is hard to imagine,
Oh yeah, that too! I was first hit by that reading the roast potato post, and I was all set to say "Roz, why of all the things you've posted on here does it put an adult content warning on this post?"; then I came to the thread there which explains that it applies to everything. Related complaint: why do I have to be Anonymous just because I'm not an LJ user? If I had ever considered getting an LJ account, the kerfuffle before last would have convinced me not to, ever. Susan F
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-11-30 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-01 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)Bill Burns
Not fit for children
(Anonymous) 2007-12-02 12:08 pm (UTC)(link)Graham
Re: Not fit for children
(Anonymous) 2007-12-04 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)I was first hit by that reading the roast potato post, and I was all set to say "Roz, why of all the things you've posted on here does it put an adult content warning on this post?"; then I came to the thread there which explains that it applies to everything.
Related complaint: why do I have to be Anonymous just because I'm not an LJ user? If I had ever considered getting an LJ account, the kerfuffle before last would have convinced me not to, ever.
Susan F