rozk: (Default)
[personal profile] rozk
The Pink News have published a retraction of the earlier story alleging that the Toiletgate demonstrators were violent here.

Date: 2008-09-17 10:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paratti.livejournal.com
Excellent.

Date: 2008-09-17 11:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Well done!

Date: 2008-09-17 11:17 am (UTC)

Date: 2008-09-17 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roadnotes.livejournal.com
Excellent!

Date: 2008-09-17 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zoep.livejournal.com
[adds to general chorus of huzzahs]

from Mair

Date: 2008-09-17 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Good Im very pleased about it

Date: 2008-09-17 07:30 pm (UTC)
ext_28673: (Default)
From: [identity profile] lisaquestions.livejournal.com
That's great. :)

Date: 2008-09-17 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murphys-lawyer.livejournal.com
Jolly Well Done.

Date: 2008-09-17 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] natalie-456.livejournal.com
excellent!

Date: 2008-09-18 12:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulathomas.livejournal.com
Good - are there now any outstanding issues?

Helen notes...

Date: 2008-09-23 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
...that they repeat the original story quite early in the article, but do not actually explain what really happenend till the end. Thus the reader is first given an image that is negative, which emotively the explanation does not effectively correct. I hope they didn't do that deliberately, but as journos this is pretty much lesson 101. I wonder who's stitching you.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 12:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios