More from JB, I fear
Nov. 8th, 2008 02:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
But I for one do not wish to be lumped in with an ever-increasing list of folk defined by "odd" sexual habits or characteristics. Shall we just start with A and work our way through the alphabet? A, androgynous, b, bisexual, c, cat-fancying d, devil worshipping. Where will it ever end?
She didn't just compare bisexuals to Satanists and pet-fuckers? Yep, she did.here.. Julie, Julie - sometimes you transcend satire.
She didn't just compare bisexuals to Satanists and pet-fuckers? Yep, she did.here.. Julie, Julie - sometimes you transcend satire.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:52 pm (UTC)Just to, like, stir things a bit.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 03:00 pm (UTC)I've been quiet on these discussions. People know my attitude towards her, I still get random emails from transwomen now and again about my article challenging JB to a wrestling match in bikinis and baked beans. I think she'd probably beat me, because she is tough, crazy and mean, but I've got the advantage of heft.
Anyway, just to say: go you. Thanks for stating the history behind this row, and putting the Stonewall stuff into context through posts and conversations with others. People do forget that history, as you know. I'm awed by your tenacity, articulacy and memory and cheering you and the other protestors on from West Ireland.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 11:17 am (UTC)One who gets paid for using trolling as 'research', sadly.
hee hee
Date: 2008-11-08 03:02 pm (UTC)And it wasn't just bisexuals she compared to pet fuckers; if you look at the narrative logic to that point, she's drawn the net of those defined by "kinky" sex play as being practically the whole of the LGBT etc community. Better editing and a moment's reflection might have saved her, but instead of soberly pressing delete on this car-crash, she pressed "send to the Guardian".
Whoops. Sit back and enjoy as other groups realise what she said.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 03:15 pm (UTC)a) such 'jokes' will inevitably be taken out of context (I'm not saying you did this, but others may) so need to be totally unambiguous.
b) context is broader than the actual piece but includes a history that is traumatic and hate-filled.
c) even if the 'joke' is funny, or non-harmful, in the midst of a heated debate it may not be taken that way.
So, regardless of the rights or wrongs of JB's arguments or yours (and I am too poorly informed to comment) it just seems that an experienced writer should know better than to make such clumsy comments.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:21 pm (UTC)I also note that this post is about an article by someone who is more than happy to be defined by her sexuality.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 03:52 pm (UTC)And yes, I fear she did just compare bisexuals to Satanists. I suppose that, should she reach "I", it wouldn't stand for "intolerant ingrate," would it?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:24 pm (UTC)Never mind Satan - will nobody think of the poor cats?!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:40 pm (UTC)=^.^=
I Am NOT a "PET FUCKER"
Date: 2008-11-08 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:30 pm (UTC)This JB is a nutter.
From Mair
Date: 2008-11-08 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 05:31 pm (UTC)Do you know whether anyone involved in the protests has plans to pitch an article to the Guardian giving the other side of the story? I would be interested to know whether the Guardian publishes Bindel because they have sympathies with her transphobia or whether they think they're pushing the envelope by publishing both sides of a "debate". Kira Cochrane appears to sympathise with Bindel's abolitionist position on sex work issues, so I wonder whether she also agrees with her transphobia.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:19 pm (UTC)But then again, having employed writers such as Bindel, Burchill, Batty & Greer you can suppose that at the Guardian you don't have to be transphobic, but it does seem to help.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:31 pm (UTC)the guardian i would say supports this proof quite snugly. (oh and their arts column has become a similar bastion of strident liberal conservatism)
frances
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 05:38 pm (UTC)So, what part of if you want to be left alone, leave us alone does she not get?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:06 pm (UTC)Thanks so much for all your hard work on this.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 11:05 pm (UTC)<-- considers forming 'Time Agents annoyed with being lumped in with satanists'.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 11:21 pm (UTC)I'm sorry, was I supposed to be taking her seriously?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 01:39 am (UTC)