rozk: (Default)
[personal profile] rozk
1. The New River is one of London's miracles - an aqueduct built in C17 to bring water to the capital from Edmonton, parts of it are now little parks centred round patches of water which are sometimes stagnant and dodgy, but more often a place where there are waterfowl of various kinds.

Yesterday [livejournal.com profile] vschanoes and I walked from Angel tube to Abney Park cemetery via New River Walk in Canonbury and Clissold Park, looking at deer and various gravestones. In Canonbury, we turned into the Walk and found ourselves standing a foot away from a heron, which looked at us, and then looked away and just stood there, trusting. It was the sort of encounter with the natural world you do not expect in comparatively central London.

2. The reason why Galloway could nail Hitchens so crushingly, and why Hitchens' response in an article a day later is surprisingly effective in the circumstances, is that they are two men with an awful lot in common. We always hate what we fear is ourselves.

They are, in the end, both overgrown boys who eroticize and idolize the irresponsible and brutal use of arbitrary ruthless power. That, in the end, matters more to them than Galloway's sentimental attachment to some vestiges of socialist ideals or Hitchens' fetishizng Orwell-worship.

There is probably a shared reason why both of them are solidly anti-abortion, but I am not their therapist.

3. Reading the mainstream critical responses to the Sith thing almost makes me want to defend Lucas, who has become the whipping boy for everything critics rightly dislike about Hollywood. I am inclined to think that he is a tragic case - someone with an interesting vision who mostly has not trusted other, more competent people with his baby except when it comes to expertises like design in which he knows himself incompetent. 'The Empire Strikes Back' had a good script-writer and that is why it is so far and away the best of the six films. If there is a malaise in Hollywood, it is not so much the cult of the blockbuster as the fact that people tend to put the quality of the script low down on their list of priorities.

'Kingdom of Heaven' is a case in point, with lines that should never have made it onto the screen. 'I fought for two days with an arrow in my left testicle'(and considered myself lucky) is a clunker comparable with 'Yonder lies da castle of my fadda' or 'War. War. War. That's all you think of, Dickie Lionheart.' Or my personal favourite: 'Lenin, meet Trotsky'/'Stalin, you've been avoiding me.'

Date: 2005-05-23 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
Anakins lines during Phantom Menace though, surely rank as some of the most awful lines in cinema history. Particularly his quips during the space battle. 'Whoa! This is so tense!'

And yes. I still find it remarkable that the heron was so comfortable with you for so long.

Date: 2005-05-23 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com
Alas, 't was ever thus. Cf Wodehouse's tales of how writers in Hollywood were treated...I don't think they've ever got quite used to the idea that the actors have to have words to say these days.

Date: 2005-05-23 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pnh.livejournal.com
Reading remarks like yours about Galloway and Hitchens almost makes me want to defend actual boys, who have become the whipping, er, boys for everything people rightly dislike about a certain kind of crappy male grownup.

Not many actual male children do the kind of damage to the world that Christopher Hitchens has done.

Date: 2005-05-23 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-gardener.livejournal.com
'I fought for two days with an arrow in my left testicle'

Oh dear. I was thinking of going to see Kingdom of Heaven, too....

Date: 2005-05-23 11:42 am (UTC)
ext_1997: (Default)
From: [identity profile] boji.livejournal.com
The reason why Galloway could nail Hitchens so crushingly, and why Hitchens' response in an article a day later is surprisingly effective

Because I'm evidently not reading the right papers, is there any chance you could point me in the direction of these diatribe's? Please?

Thank you.

Whu?

Date: 2005-05-23 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazycrone.livejournal.com
Galloway is anti- choice? Here I was being all fannish about him because he has such a creative way with words. Damn!
I suppose I ought to be more political...

Re: Whu?

Date: 2005-05-23 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com
his party is pro-choice (or against extending legal restrictions on the right to choose) but he is personally anti-abortion: still annoying but not quite as poisonous as if he was all out to change the law

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 11:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios