rozk: (Default)
[personal profile] rozk
I am more or less fascinated by the story in e.g. the Guardian and here
http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/4457828.stm
about the guy who was told by his gym to cover up his hairy armpits. Aside from the aesthetofascism aspect of the situation, there is the bizarre lie involved in the statement that his sweat might damage the equipment.
I mean, who on earth designs gym equipment that could be damaged by sweat?

Date: 2005-11-24 02:35 pm (UTC)
ext_6283: Brush the wandering hedgehog by the fire (Default)
From: [identity profile] oursin.livejournal.com
And surely the problem, if it is a problem could be dealt with (since even people with covered armpits tend to drip while doing strenuous stuff on gym machines) by notices asking people to wipe down the equipment after use, with provision of paper towels?

Not that they necessarily do even if reminded - have been icked by sweat-slippery handles on gym machines more than once.

Date: 2005-11-24 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abostick59.livejournal.com
The sweat argument is absolute nonsense. Even if it were the case that exposed armpits resulted in more sweat being left on the equipment than otherwise, the patron should simply mop it up with his towel, exactly as he should if he were wearing a T-shirt.

Date: 2005-11-24 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] themongkey.livejournal.com
Sounds a bit like the suntan lotion that says on the bottle "keep in a cool dry place away from bright light..."

Date: 2005-11-24 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
Wrong question. Here's a better question. Who designed people so that they'll give you any bullshit excuse sooner than say "this is my arbitrary rule and I intend to enforce it"?

Date: 2005-11-25 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com
The link's broken.

Date: 2005-12-06 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
AIUI most gym equipment manufacturers do, as do many sports equipment manufacturers. Not as some bizarre conspiracy against gym users, but because (for reasons of cost) most gym equipment is at best covered with pleather, and sweat and pleather do not mix. Sweat wins everytime. Wiping down at best delays replacement.

Can't say what sweat might do to the metal or plastic parts, but IME sweat and metal don't necessarily mix well either. I have no idea what it is in the chemical composition of sweat that does this, but whatever it is, it's strong enough to have a deleterious effect on bikes when used on indoor rollers. The damage done by, um, drips to raw metal *or* on three coats of enamel plus four of paint is enough to have me (frex) prepare the bike for its winter life indoors on rollers by swaddling the bike in enough layers of J-cloths to look like an extra for a Pre-Frayed Blue and White Mummy movie.

Which would go straight to DVD, natch.
Lin




Date: 2005-12-06 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] no-absolutes.livejournal.com
grrr, body fascism makes the baby Jesus cry.
just fyi, [livejournal.com profile] thete1 tells me you're writing a book? go you! i'm friending you, feel free to peek in at my userinfo or to remain aloof to my lurkage.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 31st, 2025 05:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios