rozk: (Default)
[personal profile] rozk
Those people who have been following the whole re-emergence of radical queer trans politics here need to look at the new post on [livejournal.com profile] auntysarah here for a description of the current state of play in respect of the meeting a few of us had yesterday to discuss possible ways forward. This was not so much a meeting to set anything up, or even a meeting to discuss such a meeting, as a meeting to decide that at some point down the track, a meeting to discuss meetings about meetings should happen.

No cabal, as I said a while back in a post that someone on the Guardian Comment is Free page took as evidence that there was a cabal; just some friends who meet anyway and know that Something Needs to Be Done.

This post has been in the interests of total transparency.

Meanwhile, I am gettng somewhat vexed with Pride's failure to commit themselves to any clear policy about trans access at next year's Pride - there has been a flurry of letters today of which more, if necessary, in due course.

Doesn't matter what we do

Date: 2008-11-17 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
given the highly charged nature of relationships between feminists, various gay/queer organisations and the disparate trans community, I imagine that any activity or even absence of activity will be seen by somebody as threatening.

We're flying blind too. We simply aren't in a position to know what's happening as others see their vested interest as best maintained by a silence that has led us to suspect their motives. We no longer trust certain organisations who are supposed to be on our side and they aren't communicating with us cos they don't seem to trust us either (despite our needs being their concern - but that's career politics).

somewhere Bindel is laughing at the consternation she has wrought.
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 05:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios